Changes in postpartum insurance and care use by disability status during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities face unique health needs and barriers to perinatal care. The pandemic may have worsened health care access disparities, while pandemic-era Medicaid provisions potentially improved access via increased insurance coverage. OBJECTIVE: We assessed changes in postpartum insurance, visits, and reproductive health care during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and PHE Medicaid provisions among individuals with disabilities versus individuals without disabilities. METHODS: We used the 2019-2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey and Disability Supplement to compare changes in postpartum outcomes by disability status during COVID-19. Adjusted regression models included an interaction term between disability status and postpartum exposure to the PHE. Comparative differences were examined overall, among low-income respondents, and among respondents with Medicaid-paid deliveries. RESULTS: During the PHE, there was a significant increase in postpartum Medicaid by 7.1% points (95 % CI: 0.6, 13.6) and a decrease in uninsurance by 5.2% points (95 % CI: -9.0, -1.4) among respondents with disabilities relative to those without. There was a significant increase in postpartum contraception during the PHE among respondents with disabilities relative to those without by 6.3% points (95 % CI: -0.1, 12.5). The PHE was associated with larger increases in postpartum Medicaid and larger decreases in postpartum uninsurance among low-income respondents, with similar estimates among respondents with Medicaid-insured deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 PHE, individuals with disabilities saw increased postpartum insurance and improved contraceptive use. As PHE Medicaid provisions are rolled back, these differential improvements should be factored into decisions about postpartum Medicaid eligibility.

Infant Health Care Disruptions by Race and Ethnicity, Income, and Insurance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Research has found disruptions in pediatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic, likely exacerbating existing disparities, which has not been explored among infants. This study evaluated how infant health care was disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic overall and by race and ethnicity, income, and insurance type. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System COVID-19 supplement with data from 29 jurisdictions to examine infant health care disruptions due to the pandemic: 1) well visits/checkups canceled or delayed, 2) well visits/checkups changed to virtual appointments, and 3) postponed immunizations. Unadjusted, weighted proportions of outcomes were calculated overall and by race and ethnicity, income, and insurance. We estimated multivariable odds ratios for the association between infant care disruptions and race and ethnicity, income, and insurance. RESULTS: Overall, among 12,053 parental respondents with infants born from April to December 2020, 7.25% reported cancelations or delays in infant well visits/checkups, 5.49% reported changes to virtual infant care appointments, and 5.33% reported postponing immunizations, with significant differences by race and ethnicity, income, and insurance type. In adjusted analyses, we found higher odds of canceling/delaying visits and postponing immunizations among non-Hispanic Black infants and infants whose parents were uninsured or had Medicaid-paid deliveries. The odds of switching to virtual appointments were significantly higher among Hispanic infants and infants whose parents had Medicaid-paid deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic particularly affected infant health care for non-Hispanic Black infants and infants whose parents were uninsured or had Medicaid, with important implications for addressing infant health inequities and improving health outcomes in the United States.

Social Determinants and Perinatal Hardships During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: This study examined perinatal experiences of pandemic-related hardships and disparities by race/ethnicity, income, insurance type at childbirth, and urban/rural residency. Materials and Methods: We used cross-sectional survey data from the 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System COVID-19 supplement in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City to explore: (1) job loss or cut work hours/pay, (2) having to move/relocate or becoming homeless, (3) problems paying the rent, mortgage, or bills, or (4) worries that food would run out. We estimated the prevalence of outcomes overall and by race/ethnicity, income, insurance, and urban/rural residency. We used weighted multivariable logistic regression models to calculate adjusted predicted probabilities. Results: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 31.9% of respondents reported losing their job or having a cut in work hours or pay, 11.2% of respondents had to move/relocate or became homeless, 21.8% had problems paying the rent, mortgage, or bills, and 16.86% reported worries that food would run out. Compared to overall, rates of all hardships were higher among respondents who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, uninsured, or Medicaid insured. The adjusted predicted probability of employment instability, financial hardships, and food insecurity was significantly higher among non-Hispanic Black respondents and respondents who were uninsured. The adjusted predicted probability of all hardships was significantly higher among respondents with Medicaid. Conclusions: Black, Medicaid-insured, and uninsured respondents were particularly vulnerable to perinatal hardships during COVID-19. Our results suggest a need to alleviate the overall and disparate consequences of hardships for individuals who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Differences in Use of Fertility Treatment Between People With Medicaid and Private Health Insurance Coverage in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare differences in receipt of any and specific types of fertility services between people with Medicaid and private insurance. METHODS: We used National Survey of Family Growth (2002-2019) data and linear probability regression models to examine the association between insurance type (Medicaid or private) and fertility service use. The primary outcome was use of fertility services in the past 12 months, and secondary outcomes were use of specific types of fertility services at any time: 1) testing, 2) common medical treatment, and 3) use of any fertility treatment type (testing, medical treatment, or surgical treatment of infertility). We additionally calculated time-to-pregnancy using a method that estimates the unobserved total amount of time the respondent spent trying to become pregnant using their current duration of pregnancy attempt at the time of the survey. We calculated time-to-pregnancy ratios across respondent characteristics to examine if insurance type was associated with differential time-to-pregnancy. RESULTS: In adjusted models, Medicaid coverage was associated with an 11.2-percentage point (95% confidence interval: -22.3 to -0.0) lower use of fertility services in the past 12 months compared with private coverage. Relative to private coverage, Medicaid insurance was also associated with large and statistically significantly lower rates of ever having used infertility testing or any fertility services. Insurance type was not associated with differences in time-to-pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: People covered by Medicaid were less likely to have used fertility services compared with people with private insurance. Differences in coverage of fertility services between Medicaid and private payers may represent a barrier to fertility treatment for Medicaid recipients.

Association of New York State's Marketplace Special Enrollment Period for Pregnancy With Prenatal Insurance Coverage.

This cross-sectional study uses Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data to investigate the association between marketplace pregnancy special enrollment and prenatal insurance coverage in New York.

Perinatal Care Changes During COVID-19: A Population-Based Analysis by Race/Ethnicity.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 public health emergency created unprecedented disruptions in the use of healthcare services, which could have affected long-standing racial‒ethnic disparities in maternal care use and outcomes. This study evaluates population-level changes in perinatal health services associated with the COVID-19 pandemic overall and by maternal race‒ethnicity. METHODS: In this analysis of all U.S. live births from 2016 to 2020, interrupted time-series analysis was used to estimate the change in the mean number of prenatal care visits and rates of hospital birth, labor induction, and cesarean delivery associated with the start of the pandemic (March 2020) overall and by maternal race‒ethnicity. Analyses were conducted in 2022. RESULTS: The start of the pandemic was associated with overall decreases in the mean number of prenatal care visits, decreases in hospital birth rates, and increases in labor induction rates. The mean number of prenatal care visits decreased similarly for all racial‒ethnic groups, whereas reductions in hospital births were largest for non-Hispanic White individuals, and increases in labor induction were largest for non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Among all U.S. live births, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with modest overall changes in perinatal care, with differential changes by maternal race‒ethnicity. Differential changes in perinatal services may have implications for racial-ethnic maternal health disparities.

Changes in Postpartum Insurance Coverage in the US During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This cross-sectional study examines changes in postpartum insurance churn during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Association Between Postpartum Insurance Instability and Access to Postpartum Mental Health Services: Evidence From Colorado.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the association between postpartum insurance instability and access to postpartum mental health services. METHODS: We used 2018-2019 Colorado Health eMoms survey data, which sampled mothers from the 2018 birth certificate files at 3-6 months and 12-14 months postpartum. Respondents were classified as stably insured or unstably insured based on postpartum insurance status at each time point. We examined postpartum insurance patterns and used logistic regression to assess the association between postpartum insurance instability and mental health care access. RESULTS: Insurance changes primarily occurred by 3-6 months postpartum. Of respondents with public coverage at childbirth, 33.2% experienced postpartum insurance changes compared with 9.5% with private coverage (p < .001). Respondents who were younger, had incomes of less than $50,000, and were of Hispanic ethnicity were more likely to experience unstable postpartum insurance. Respondents who experienced postpartum insurance instability had a lower odds of reporting that they discussed mental health at a postpartum check-up (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.7; p < .01) and received postpartum mental health services (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of postpartum insurance disruptions occurred among respondents with public coverage at childbirth and by 3-6 months postpartum. Respondents who experienced unstable coverage were more likely to have less access to postpartum mental health care. Policies that increase postpartum insurance stability, such as postpartum Medicaid extensions beyond 60 days, are needed to improve access to postpartum mental health services.

Presumptive eligibility for pregnancy Medicaid and timely prenatal care access.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the adoption of presumptive eligibility for pregnancy Medicaid in Kansas in 2016 and timely prenatal care access. DATA SOURCE: 2012-2019 National Center for Health Statistics natality files. STUDY DESIGN: We used difference-in-differences to compare outcomes before (2012-2015) and after (2017-2019) presumptive eligibility in Kansas relative to seven control group states overall and stratified by maternal education. Outcomes included first-trimester prenatal care, the month of first prenatal visit, and adequate prenatal care. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: All live births among adults aged 20 or older in Kansas, Idaho, Missouri, Nebraska, Tennessee, Utah, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among all births, we found no evidence that presumptive eligibility in Kansas resulted in changes in prenatal care use. Among individuals with high school education or less, presumptive eligibility was associated with a 1.92 percentage-point increase (95% CI: 0.64, 4.35) in first-trimester prenatal care, driven by earlier month of first prenatal care visit. CONCLUSIONS: Presumptive eligibility in Medicaid non-expansion states may lead to small improvements in early prenatal care among individuals with lower education, but other interventions may be needed.

Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: Before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 55% of individuals giving birth with Medicaid lost insurance postpartum, potentially affecting their access to postpartum contraception. We evaluate the association of the ACA Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy at the time of the survey. METHODS: We used 2012-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data to estimate difference-in-difference models for the association of Medicaid expansions with the use of postpartum contraception (mean: 4 months postpartum): any contraception, long-acting reversible contraception, or LARC (contraceptive implant and intrauterine device), short-acting (contraceptive pill, patch, and ring), permanent, or non-prescription methods (condoms, rhythm method, and withdrawal), and pregnancy at the time of the survey. We examine low-income respondents overall and stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: We find that Medicaid expansion was associated with a 7.0 percentage point (95% CI: 3.0, 11.0) increase in postpartum LARC, a 3.1 percentage point (95% CI: -6.0, -0.2) decrease in short-acting contraception, and a 3.9 percentage point (95% CI: -6.2, -1.5) decrease in non-prescription contraceptive use overall. In stratified analyses, we find that increases in LARC use were concentrated among non-Hispanic White and Black respondents, with shifts in other postpartum contraceptives towards LARCs. Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in early postpartum pregnancy only among non-Hispanic Black respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansions led to shifts from methods with a lower upfront out-of-pocket cost for people without insurance towards methods with the higher upfront out-of-pocket cost for people without insurance. These changes suggest that Medicaid expansion improved postpartum contraceptive access. IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that postpartum uninsurance was a barrier to postpartum contraceptive access prior to Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act. Medicaid expansions increased access to the full range of contraceptive methods.

Association of Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions with Births Among Low-Income Women of Reproductive Age.

Background: This study examined the association between Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and births among low-income women of reproductive age in the United States. Materials and Methods: We used data from the 2008 to 2019 American Community Survey to estimate the association between state adoption of Medicaid expansion under the ACA and the percent of low-income women of reproductive age with a birth in the past year using a difference-in-difference research design. Subgroup analysis was explored by race and ethnicity, age group, educational attainment, marital status, and number of children. Results: We found that Medicaid expansion was associated with a small reduction in births among low-income women of reproductive age by 0.45 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -0.84 to -0.05). In subgroup analyses, we found reductions in births among Hispanic women, American Indian or Alaska Native women, women 25-29 years of age, women 35-39 years of age, unmarried women, and women with more than three children. Conclusions: Reductions in births associated with Medicaid expansion could suggest that expanding Medicaid addressed previously unmet reproductive health care needs among low-income women of reproductive age. The reductions in births among low-income women that we observe were occurring among some groups with higher unintended pregnancy rates, including Hispanic women, American Indian or Alaska Native women, young women, and unmarried women. These findings underscore the importance of reproductive health care access through insurance coverage on empowering women to have control over their reproductive decision-making and timing.

Mortality Disparities Among Sexual Minority Adults in the United States.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate mortality disparities for sexual minority adults in the United States. Methods: We used data from 26,384 adult respondents using the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, linked with National Death Index mortality files. Respondents reporting one or more same-sex sexual partners in their lifetime or who identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual were considered sexual minority adults (617 sexual minority males and 963 sexual minority females). We examined gender-stratified mortality frequencies by sexual minority status and used gender-stratified Cox proportional hazard models to investigate mortality risk for sexual minority adults compared with non-sexual-minority adults. Results: We observed significantly elevated mortality risk among sexual minority females compared with non-sexual-minority females, robust across model specifications. Estimates ranged from an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-3.2) to 2.1 (95% CI: 1.4-3.3) among sexual minority females compared with non-sexual-minority females, with estimates at approximately double the risk of mortality. We found no evidence of differential mortality risk for sexual minority males compared with non-sexual-minority males. Conclusion: These results suggest mortality disparities for sexual minority females compared with non-sexual-minority females. Future research should consider mortality disparities among subgroups of sexual minority adults and include targeted data collection to increase understanding of the mechanisms behind mortality disparities.

Understanding the Aggressive Practices of Nonprofit Hospitals in Pursuit of Patient Debt.

Nonprofit hospitals have attracted scrutiny for aggressive collection activities against patients, which persist despite the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's attempt to limit particularly egregious practices, called "extraordinary collection actions" (ECAs). This study examines the prevalence of ECAs and characteristics of nonprofit hospitals that reported this behavior as of 2016. Using Community Benefit Insight data, characteristics of hospitals that reported ECAs are compared with hospitals that did not report these practices. ECAs include reporting patient debt to credit agencies, filing lawsuits, placing liens on residences, and issuing civil arrest. Predictors of ECAs among nonprofit hospitals are identified using logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of ECAs is examined for the 2010-2016 time period, and nonprofit hospitals that reported ECAs are mapped to show the geographic distribution. Hospitals reporting ECAs significantly differed in total revenue, system membership, bed size, urban location, financial assistance policy use, and use of poverty guidelines for discounted care. In full logistic regression models, lower total hospital revenue was a significant predictor of ECAs. As social workers, it is vital to understand the landscape of nonprofit hospital collection actions to advocate for policy that protects patients from predatory practices while holding nonprofit hospitals accountable.

Mental Health and Postpartum Care in California: Implications from California's Provisional Postpartum Care Extension.

BACKGROUND: California's Provisional Postpartum Care Extension (PPCE) extended Medicaid eligibility through 1 year postpartum for women enrolled in Medi-Cal with annual household incomes of 138%-322% of the federal poverty level and maternal mental health diagnoses. METHODS: For this cross-sectional descriptive study, we used the 2017 Listening to Mothers in California survey of postpartum women to identify those potentially eligible for PPCE. We then sought to describe their demographic characteristics, self-reported mental health, and utilization of postpartum care and mental health services compared with those with Medi-Cal during pregnancy who did not meet PPCE eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Overall, potentially PPCE-eligible women comprised 6.8% of respondents. Among those who did not qualify for PPCE, the primary reason was the absence of self-reported maternal mental health symptoms. Potentially PPCE-eligible women were approximately two-thirds Hispanic/Latina and more than one-third were ages 25 to 29. The most common self-reported mental health symptom was anxiety during pregnancy (78.9%). Among potentially PPCE-eligible women, 8.4% were taking medicine for anxiety/depression postpartum and 16.0% were receiving postpartum counseling/treatment for emotional or mental well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest that PPCE could have extended postpartum coverage eligibility for approximately 30,360 women statewide. However, our findings demonstrate how narrowly defined PPCE eligibility criteria likely excluded many postpartum women in Medi-Cal who would have been left with limited benefits or more cost-sharing under alternative coverage options. This research could inform state and federal policymakers considering other proposals to extend postpartum Medicaid eligibility.

Association of Medicaid vs Marketplace Eligibility on Maternal Coverage and Access With Prenatal and Postpartum Care.

Importance: Policy makers are considering insurance expansions to improve maternal health. The tradeoffs between expanding Medicaid or subsidized private insurance for maternal coverage and care are unknown. Objective: To compare maternal coverage and care by Medicaid vs marketplace eligibility. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study using a difference-in-difference research design was conducted from March 14, 2020, to April 22, 2021. Maternal coverage and care use were compared among women with family incomes 100% to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) residing in 10 Medicaid expansion sites (exposure group) who gained Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act and in 5 nonexpansion sites (comparison group) who gained marketplace eligibility before (2011-2013) and after (2015-2018) insurance expansion implementation. Participants included women aged 18 years or older from the 2011-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey. Exposures: Eligibility for Medicaid or marketplace coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included coverage in the preconception and postpartum periods, early and adequate prenatal care, and postpartum checkups and effective contraceptive use. Results: The study population included 11 432 women age 18 years and older (32% age 18-24 years, 33% age 25-29 years, 35% age ≥30 years) with incomes 100% to 138% FPL: 7586 in a Medicaid state (exposure group) and 3846 in a nonexpansion marketplace state (comparison group). Women in marketplace states were younger, had higher educational level and marriage rates, and had less racial and ethnic diversity. Medicaid relative to marketplace eligibility was associated with increased Medicaid coverage (20.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 12.8 to 30.0 percentage points), decreased private insurance coverage (-10.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -13.3 to -7.5 percentage points), and decreased uninsurance (-8.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -20.1 to -0.1 percentage points) in the preconception period, increased postpartum Medicaid (17.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.7 to 34.3 percentage points) and increased adequate prenatal care (4.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 11.0 percentage points) in difference-in-difference models. No evidence of significant differences in early prenatal care, postpartum check-ups, or postpartum contraception was identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, eligibility for Medicaid was associated with increased Medicaid, lower preconception uninsurance, and increased adequate prenatal care use. The lower rates of preconception uninsurance among Medicaid-eligible women suggest that women with low incomes were facing barriers to marketplace enrollment, underscoring the potential importance of reducing financial barriers for the population with low incomes.

Adoption of Medicaid Expansion Is Associated with Lower Maternal Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: This study explores the effect of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on the maternal mortality ratio in the United States. METHODS: A difference-in-differences research design was used to analyze the effect of Medicaid expansion on maternal mortality. Maternal mortality was defined with and without late maternal deaths, to substantiate the contribution of increased preconception and postpartum insurance coverage. To examine whether there was a racial difference in the effects of Medicaid expansion, models were stratified by the woman's race/ethnicity for non-Hispanic Black women, non-Hispanic White women, and Hispanic women. RESULTS: Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with lower maternal mortality by 7.01 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births (p = .002) relative to nonexpansion states. When maternal mortality definitions excluded late maternal deaths, Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with a decrease in maternal mortality per 100,000 live births by 6.65 (p = .004) relative to nonexpansion states. Medicaid expansion effects were concentrated among non-Hispanic Black mothers, suggesting that expansion could be contributing to decreasing racial disparities in maternal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although maternal mortality overall continues to increase in the United States, the maternal mortality ratio among Medicaid expansion states has increased much less compared with nonexpansion states. These results suggest that Medicaid expansion could be contributing to a relative decrease in the maternal mortality ratio in the United States. The decrease in the maternal mortality ratio is greater when maternal mortality estimates include late maternal deaths, suggesting that sustained insurance coverage after childbirth as well as improved preconception coverage could be contributing to decreasing maternal mortality.